- Details
- Written by: Shaun Brooker
- Hits: 63
I never thought I would do this, but in the first few weeks of my time at a new Christian School, I threatened to shut down the Scripture/Bible programme. I love the Scriptures and value their place in Christian schools; however, they were doing more harm than good in this case. I know that sounds almost blasphemous, but from what we could tell, the short-term and long-term impact that the program was having was more negative than positive.
It consistently received the worst feedback from students and parents and was the only subject that some board members’ children had dispensation not to attend. This is not a good look for a Christian School.
I did not want to close the programme, but I felt I had little choice. The current curriculum and pedagogy left many students bored and despising both the class and what it represented.
I met with the teachers of Bible to discuss the pending difficult decision. After a lengthy discussion, I asked them why they think we teach Bible classes at school. Their answer was to help students live by its ways and know how to interpret Scripture. It was then that I realised what was wrong; our purpose for a Bible programme in school was well intended but not well considered.
After some deep reflection, our programme now has a threefold purpose and is intentionally implemented through these three dimensions, not just in the senior years but across the school.
Three-fold Purpose: Authoritative, Relevant and Curiosity
When all three objectives are present, the program has value. However, if even one of the objectives is missing, the program requires major Holy Spirit intervention to be good.
Authoritative: Our students need to understand that they can trust the Bible as a guide for life; its words are more than just a suggestion or another piece of advice. The words are from our Creator, the designer of our being, and the words contained in Scripture are true and trustworthy. Ultimately, what is present in Scripture is not suggestions but truth.
Relevant: Scripture is more than a historical document. The words on the page were recorded so long ago that they are relevant to the world we live in today. They give us direction on how to live in harmony with others, how to live a full life and how to find peace with our Creator. They speak of how to live a life of no regrets and understand the temptations and sins that are prevalent in the 21st century. The relevance of the Bible enables us to live a life of fulfilment and inner peace.
Curiosity: Our students need to develop a curiosity for Scripture. There is a need to ensure that our students desire to read the scripture, to grow a passion to learn more and to engage frequently with it. This is not something that is necessarily ‘taught’, rather it is more likely caught. Teachers who love the Scriptures are more likely to inspire a love for the Scripture in their students.
A solid Bible programme within a Christian school needs to have all three objectives present in order to be effective for our students. These three objectives will help students understand the completeness of His Word. The intentional involvement of these objectives must be delivered through meaningful exposure to and saturation of the content of Scripture.
When the triad objectives are central to a scripture programme in a Christian school (or even a Sunday School), the Bible is not presented as a collection of stories but a series of lessons. Rather than learning about Daniel and the lion’s den, students are taught about God’s faithfulness even when we don’t understand how we can get out of something…with the lion's den as an illustration of this faithfulness. We do not teach Scripture for history’s sake; we must teach Bible in such a way that it equips our students for the future God calls them into.
The Bible is not Shakespeare and it is not Aesop’s fables; it is the Living Word of God, full of reminders of who our Creator is, the promises He has for us and His instructions for how to live our best lives. We need to be sure our Bible classes reflect this truth.
One final and practical note. Our students are less likely to develop a curiosity for the Scriptures if their teachers do not have it. This is not a skill or even teachable. As with students, it is caught. Either hire well or create an environment that values and models this.
The following table explores what happens when any one of the triad objectives is absent from a Bible program. Like a three-legged stool with one leg missing, the program loses its value significantly.
The Effect of a Missing Triad Objective.
Present Objectives |
Missing Objectives |
Result |
Curiosity, Relevant |
Authoritative |
Students see the scripture as a good book that can provide options and suggestions on how to live. |
Curiosity, Authoritative |
Relevant |
Students are interested in what the Bible says but see its words as a historical document that speaks with authority as to why ancient society broke down. |
Relevant, Authoritative |
Curiosity |
Students know that Scripture speaks with authority to the issues within society today and how I should live, but there is little interest in exploring what it says. |
Relevant, Curiosity, Authoritative |
|
Students know that Scripture speaks with authority to how they are to live life today and desire to know more about what it says. |
Do not stop teaching Bible in your Christian School. And when you teach it, do so with the triad objectives in a way that students understand the completeness of the Canon, the way the authors knit with precision, prophecy, poetry, miracles and manuscript, wisdom and parables.
Would I have pulled the Bible programme from our school? I do not think so. However, it sure is important to get our objectives right for what we hope to achieve in such an important program in a Christian school. Christian education must bring students closer to the Scriptures, not create a barrier between them and a lifelong love for His Word.
I pray God gives you wisdom as you review your students experience of your Bible programme.
Shaun
- Details
- Written by: Shaun Brooker
- Hits: 826
Schools are busy places. And we only get a limited number of minutes each day to make the most of every opportunity we have with our students. To make to do so requires teachers to be aware of what adds value to learning and what distracts from learning.
Flatlined Achievement Time, is one way to discribe time that students spend at school where they are not meaningfully engaging in activities that lead to achievement. This time is what I refer to as FAT. Schools or classrooms that have to much FAT are doing their students a disservice.
There are many times during a typical school day that FAT is present. All of the following can be described as FAT:
- Waiting for the teacher to return from the staffroom after break
- Messy transitions between classes or subjects
- Writing long dates and no necessary details and lines in books
- Miss-matched activities to intended learning objectives
- Colouring in, word finds, drawing pictures for their writing
- At times publishing too many pieces of writing
Students can be experiencing FAT while they look very engaged. If you asked a group of students to play a game on their device, they would likely look very engaged, however, they are not likely engaging in meaningful learning.
THE ISSUE WITH A LITTLE FAT
It would be a lazy and cruel teacher who would want to waste students time at school through the continually inclusion of FAT in the classroom. However, the issue with FAT is that there is often small doses of FAT experienced throughout the day that, over time, add up to a lot of FAT.
Consider messy transitions between subjects during the day. Now, I am a realist and have been a teacher for too many decades to mention so I am well aware that transitions are a necessary part of the day and it is almost impossible to eliminate them. The FAT is experienced when transitions are messy and take longer than they need. Let’s consider a classroom where transitions take on average one minute longer than it needs to when transitioning. And there were just four transitions per day and 200 school days a year.
In the above scenario, there are about three school days of learning each year wasted to FAT, just because the teacher has not streamlined the transition process.
Now consider the teacher who hears the school bell signalling the end of a break time and then uses the bathroom and makes a coffee to take back to class. Interesting reflection on Pavlov’s bell causing teachers to need coffee and pee when the bell rings. Assuming this takes 4 minutes each time (maybe a little too quick) and happens just two times a day. That would equate to another 5-6 days of FAT each year.
Furthermore students who spend just one hour per week on meaningless, busy work, there would be another eight days gone to waste for the school year.
Before we dig too deep into where FAT exists, a couple of weeks of learning each year is sacrificed to FAT.
THE IMPORTANCE OF INTENTIONAL FAT
Not all FAT is bad. Engaging in learning at 100% intensity is simply exhausting. The master teacher knows how to use FAT intentionally to ultimately create the best learning environment for their learners. Like relationship, time is a precious commodity in the classroom. The master teacher is aware of how little time they have and uses it wisely.
The mediocre teacher is most often unaware of the ways FAT is present within their learning environment. The worst of teachers know and don’t care, they just want the students to work on something that keeps them quiet.
REFLECTION.
- Are you aware of that FAT exists within your learning environment?
- How can you use FAT to maximise the performance of your learners?
- Details
- Written by: Shaun Brooker
- Hits: 804
Four Step Plan
A Plan for Collaborative Learning Spaces.
There are many ways schools are structured. In many schools worldwide, there has been a return to larger or flexible spaces with multiple classes where multiple teachers work or ‘collaborate’ together for the benefit of many students.
At Hamilton Christian School, we have a structure like this. We refer to it as our villages. In each village, we have approximately 110 students with five or six adults; four teachers, a teaching team leader and in the younger years we have a teacher aide for some or all of the day.
The key idea is that all adults are responsible for all students. The language of the village is ours, and we, not me and mine.
Learning is designed with a ‘Learner first’ mentality, and how we engage students for meaningful progress is the big question. To achieve this we have a four-step planning process that ensures that we create learning experiences that students are engaged in and allows teachers to teach in ways that energise them.
When actioned, the 110 students are not cleanly divided into groups of 26/27 students, rather, students are grouped into group sizes that best match student engagement. In order to support this approach, our school villages are not designed with four equal sized classrooms, rather, each village has five or six different sized rooms that are divided with large glass sliding doors. The sliding doors enable the spaces to be flexible. At times, the doors between spaces are left open to make even larger spaces so that even more students can be a part of a unit that captures their imagination and engagement.
Critical to the success of a village to meet the needs and bring academic success for all is what we call the Four Step plan.
STEP ONE: Establish the Framework (The Team Leader)
The first step is that the Team Leader identifies the learning objective from the curriculum, designs a success rubric against the SOLO taxonomy, and, as we are a Christian School, also puts some thoughts into how we can incorporate ideas of who God is, how He designed us to flourish, learning for His Scriptures or other learnings from beyond the curriculum. At this stage, the reference point must be the source document for the curriculum. When the source document is what we did last we taught this concept, there is a possibility that there is a variation from what the actual curriculum focus is. Here the success rubric is built off the SOLO taxonomy and not the actual assessment paper. Depending on the way students engage with the unit, they can present their learning in many different ways and mediums while still being assessed against common measures.
Key Questions for Step One:
- What does the curriculum say our students need to learn now?
- How will we know they are successful?
- What Biblical context could we explore in this unit?
STEP TWO: Ideate the Possibilities (The Team - TL and Teachers).
With the unit objectives, success rubric and the students in the village front and centre, everyone shares ideas on learning experiences that could be a part of the unit. At the beginning of this stage, no idea is a bad idea. There is strength in the diversity of the team at this stage. Teachers with a passion for technology can share ideas that other teachers have never considered. Teachers with a passion for hands-on learning can share ideas that others have never considered. As the conversation evolves, everyone has the chance to grow their repertoire of how students can learn inside or outside the classroom.
Once all learning experiences are exhausted, the team prioritises and then groups the experiences. Experiences that are diverse AND best pass the test for meaningful engagement are left on the table and the experiences of modes of teaching that lead to less engagement and are less aligned to the actual learning objective(s) of the unit are discarded. Once the experiences have been culled, they are grouped for the benefit of the diversity of students in the village and teachers opt for the experiences that best motivate and capture their imagination.
Key Questions for Step Two:
- What are all the possible ways to engage students in this unit?
- What are the best ways to meaningfully engage our students with this learning objective?
- How do we group the best ways into ways that will motivate students and teachers?
- How can we structure this unit for mastery learning?
STEP THREE: Group the Students (The Team, and/or the Students)
The most important question that needs to be asked in this step is, “How can we group the students for maximum, meaningful engagement?” In the pursuit of this answer, several factors could be considered.
The experiences are grouped in ways that the current cohort of students will naturally be attracted to. And teachers opt into the grouped experiences that motivate them the most. The grouping could be to do with the mode of learning (i.e. inquiry, technology focus, hands-on/active, oral focus, EOTC, traditional or more), or experiences could be grouped through different learning contexts (i.e. in reading could be different kinds of novels; adventure, romance, historic, farming, sport or more).
Finally, the question is asked of how to deliver the unit best. There are several possibilities at this stage. The teaching team could determine which student goes where, but ideally, students are given the chance to opt in.
One way to raise student engagement in this area is to allow students to opt into which delivery mode or context they would like to be in. When given the option, students can choose a group because they prefer a mode or context for learning, but they can also choose a group because they prefer a particular teacher.
Key Questions for Step Three:
- How can we group the students for maximum, meaningful engagement?
- How can we give students a choice in which learning group they engage in?
STEP FOUR: Plan the Lessons (Individual Teacher)
Once we know what students and activities each teacher is responsible for, each teacher can then go and sequence learning for their group. The planning for this unit will also include completing the Game Plan. Here teachers take what was decided from Steps 1-3 and create their secquence for learning. Teachers will consider the learning style and progress of each learner they are responsible for and design learning that will best engage each learner meaningfully.
Key Questions for Step Four:
- How do I sequence learning experiences?
- Who am I teaching, and who do I need a Game Plan for?
Further to the four-step plan, at HCS, we have three subsequent operating principles to bring success to the village philosophy;
- Two-Year Village Cycle. At HCS, students and teachers are in each village for two years up to the end of Junior Secondary. In this way, students grow in their understanding of expectations. Most importantly, as learning focuses on meaningful engagement, teachers learn to truly know their students over the two years. And, as there are multiple teachers in each village, even if a student does not have a positive relationship with one of the teachers, they have several teachers which whom they can form a positive relationship with.
- Five-week unit cycle. As the school year is divided into four ten-week quarters or terms, at HCS, each unit is generally run through a five-week cycle.
- The Game Plan: Lastly, we have a game plan that each teacher completes once they have designed their learning unit and know who the students are teaching. The Game Plan identifies five key aspects of the unit: students who may struggle to engage in the learning due to the level of the unit being pitched outside of their Zone of Proximal Development, and students who will struggle to engage due to relational or behavioural issues. With the
In a Nutshell:
- Define the framework, objective, Worldview perspective and success rubric/
- Ideate the best learning experiences and group for meaningful engagement for the current cohort (not the one you may have had last year)
- Group students, prioritising engagement, which could involve student choice
- Individually sequence lessons and complete the game plan.
- Details
- Written by: Shaun Brooker
- Hits: 2630
Download Going Deeper slides from ACSI conference
Watch Going Deeper video prepared for ACSI IEC2022
Over many years of working in and with Christian Schools, I have recognised a generally linear pattern to how deeply authentic and intentional Christianity penetrates Christian Schools.
The stages that have been identified below are linear in nature. However, as with many general patterns, there will be exceptions. There will also be some aspects where small parts of the concepts are experienced early, but generally, the stages are very linear, and most Christian schools stop somewhere on the continuum the stages create.
The Five Stages of Deeper Authentic Christian Education
- Involving Christian Teachers - A school with Christians. (A Christian Educating)
- Isolated Christian Activities - Education with a side of Jesus. (Christian, then Education)
- Integrated Christian Curriculum - Let me tell you about Jesus. (An Educator Explaining Christian)
- Intentional Christian Pedagogy - Let me show you Jesus. (A Christian Educator)
- Invasive Christian Vision - Taking every ‘thought’ captive for Christ. (A Christian Education)
This would be very obvious for some, but as it has taken me a while to articulate it, I figured I might as well share it. Sometimes, I can go into a Christian School and it is apparent that it has integrity and a deeply authentic Christianity. The language it uses has meaning, and there is something remarkable about the students and the teachers.
- Details
- Written by: Shaun Brooker
- Hits: 2842
Like it or not, understand it or not, ignore it or not, worldview has a huge impact on our classrooms. It is more influential than curriculum than the ability of the teacher, than the tools that are used within the school and more influential than the environment of the school. It is more influential than all the above as it is our worldview that determines our approach and adoption of each of the above factors.
In education, we have two big questions which need to be at the forefront of our thinking.
1. What do my students need to learn? Now?
2. What is the best way to get each of them there?
The answers to each of these questions have several influences. The answer to the second question is primarily influenced by the teachers understanding of their individual students. The better the teacher knows each student’s learning preference, attention span, passion, cognitive ability, interests and curriculum strengths the better the teacher will be able to engage each student in the learning process. The teacher knowing what engages their student is key to answering the second question.